RE: #1 - 1/32 Slot.It Slot Cars - Collector Set - Chaparral 1st and 2nd in Laguna Seca - 1966 No. 65 and No. 66 (SICW08) Reviews
1/32 Slot.It Slot Cars - Collector Set - Chaparral 1st and 2nd in Laguna Seca - 1966 No. 65 and No. 66 (SICW08) Looking to buy 1/32 Slot.It Slot Cars - Collector Set - Chaparral 1st and 2nd in Laguna Seca - 1966 No. 65 and No. 66 (SICW08) cheap price? We offer #1 best deals 1/32 Slot.It Slot Cars - Collector Set - Chaparral 1st and 2nd in Laguna Seca - 1966 No. 65 and No. 66 (SICW08) for sale.
rondoroyal Slot.It Spare Parts The White Chaparrals, designed and built by Texas oil-man and brilliant mechanical engineer Jim Hall, hold a special place in racing history. These were the first cars to have aerodynamic wings, the first with "active" (moveable) aerodynamic klepon and the first "ground effect" cars ever to be raced. However despite the birlliance of these cars they were just too radical and while successful in the European theater, their Can-Am success would be limited to this race: The 1966 race at Laguna Seca would be the only victory for the Chappys, taking first and second with the only American-born F1 Champion Phil Hill in finishing first in the number 65 with Jim Hall second in the number 66. At the end of July we were informed that these cars will not fit an SP12 digital chip in stead they will take a C7005 chip. Here is what Slot.It told us directly: "Actually, in order to have compatibly from our classic cars (Ford GT40, Ford MKII, Alfa 33/3, Ferrari 312BP, Chaparral 2E) and SSD, the only way is using the Hornby chip C7005. At the moment SP12 fit only into Gr.C and GT slot.it cars." Where to buy 1/32 Slot.It Slot Cars - Collector Set - Chaparral 1st and 2nd in Laguna Seca - 1966 No. 65 and No. 66 (SICW08)?You can buy 1/32 Slot.It Slot Cars - Collector Set - Chaparral 1st and 2nd in Laguna Seca - 1966 No. 65 and No. 66 (SICW08) #1 best price with super saver shipping. See more prices, shipping options available and additional information via click the link below - Get it Now!![]() |




0 comments:
Post a Comment